Re: [GIT PULL] Kernel lockdown for secure boot

Linus Torvalds writes: (Summary) or rather, it's probably viable only for distributions that already have reasons to only care about controlled hardware environments, ie Chromebooks etc.
Chromebooks etc.
But a chome OS install wouldn't care about the whole "secure boot or not" issue anyway, because they'd also control that side, an they might as well just enable it unconditionally.
might as well just enable it unconditionally.
In contrast, the generic distros can't enable it anyway if it breaks random hardware. And it wouldn't be about secure boot or not, but about the random hardware choice.
about the random hardware choice.
Linus
Linus
Linus