Re: [GIT PULL] Kernel lockdown for secure boot

Linus Torvalds writes: (Summary) Why not enable it by default then?
by default then?
And if "turn off secure boot" really is the accepted - and actuially used - workaround for the breakage, then
used - workaround for the breakage, then
WHY THE HELL DIDN'T YOU START OFF BY EXPLAINING THAT IN THE FIRST PLACE WHEN PEOPLE ASKED WHY THE TIE-IN EXISTED?
PLACE WHEN PEOPLE ASKED WHY THE TIE-IN EXISTED?
Sorry for shouting, but really. All we got was incomprehensible and illogical crap explanations.
incomprehensible and illogical crap explanations.
If there actually was a good explanation for the tie-in, it should have been front-and-center and explained as such.
have been front-and-center and explained as such.
Linus
Linus
Linus